Vista

Can someone please tell me why I have to suffer a UAC prompt elevation to set environment variables for myself?  And please don’t try and justify it by telling me the UI for setting user environment variables is in the same place as system environment variables thus requiring an elevation.

Yet more evidence that Vista is simply half-baked.

That’s what I get for not reading Matt’s blog more often.  I just noticed he posted an entry about Vista now including Robocopy.  I’ve heard about Robocopy for sometime now.  With features like job scheduling, monitoring folders for changes, and copying only changed files I wonder if I could use that for a simple network backup tool.  Hmm..

What on earth is going on with mail clients in Windows?  I’m running Vista but the same problem exists with pre-Vista systems.  In Vista we have Outlook Exp Windows Mail.  Now, Vista has been in development for several decades now (it seems) so one would think Windows Mail would be finely tuned with several cool new features.  How about RSS reading?  How about much better reply quoting (see Thunderbird)?  How about the option to have most recently updated threads bubble to the top like with Outlook?  No, no, and no.  Ok, I get it.  It’s just weak enough to only be  useful for mom and dad but any serious user should consider Outlook.

If that’s the case then what’s the deal with Live Mail Desktop?  Another email client?  No wait.  Another crappy email client.  This one is worse than Windows mail (if that’s possible).  Let me count the ways..

1. Advertising bar that apparently doesn’t go away unless you subscribe to some kind of pro account.  It’s actually not very big but even on a 1280 x 1024 screen I feel cramped.
2. Pointing it at my corporate IMAP account shot memory usage up to 170 megs and the app became totally non-responsive.  It may have eventually come back; I didn’t wait around to see.
3. Selecting the option to group my emails by conversation does… nothing.
4. Moving over the email list turns the email icon on each item into a checkbox.  What for?  Got me.
5. You would think that a brand new email client that runs on Vista would detect that its running on Vista and use the spankin’ new Contacts folder right?  Bzzt.  No, it uses  your contacts from Hotmail.  So, now I have how many places where I have contacts?  Hotmail, Windows contacts, and Outlook contacts.  Priceless…
6. The fun isn’t limited to contacts either.  There is a nice calendar button in Live Mail Desktop.  Clicking it, I was sure that Windows calendar would show.  Uh, nope.  It shot me over to Hotmail calendar which is not even in the top 10 of best web calendars.  Again, how hard would it be to have Sync center keep my Hotmail calendar and contacts synced with my Vista desktop and have Live Mail Desktop use the local contacts and calendar.  Would have made too much sense.

I simply could go on and on about how bad Live Mail Desktop is.  Here’s a thought.  Instead of having two crappy mail clients (Outlook Express/Windows Mail and Live Mail Desktop), combine the teams and create one kick-butt mail client that works with the major web mail players, uses Vista features when run on Vista, and gives some serious competition to Thunderbird in the free email client market.  Then again, maybe I’m just cranky.

I normally run Windows Vista RC1 x64 but recently decided it was time for my semi-annual Linux test.  This is where I install the latest released version of a popular Linux distro and attempt to use it for as long as I can stand.  The idea of a free (as in speech) desktop is appealing but it’s a non-starter if it holds me back in any way.  Remember I said that I normally run Windows so I am referring to holding me back in any way that I’m not used to.

Anyway, the candidate was Ubuntu 6.06 and I only used it for a few hours.  Two of those hours were spent trying to get my dual-screen setup working.  Another hour was spent getting Skype to work (it did work but I had to google for several posts and then force install some packages).  Evolution crashed every time it exited.  My USB headphone worked but only after I logged out and back in.  Even then I could not get my main speakers and the USB headphones to work at the same time.  I was not able to play any of my ripped music, which is encoded to either MP3 or WMA (yes I know there are solutions for this but by this time I had lost interest).

Lately we’ve heard alot about XGL and all of it’s eye candy.  Larry recently blogged on this and posted a link to the shell team’s blog.  This post specifically talks about there not being “floppy” windows in Vista.  While including links to some cool demos from 2003, the gist of the post is that while wobbling  your windows is technically possible, it might not be the right thing for the shipping product.  The point is made that Microsoft has issues to consider that a Linux vendor can’t possibly imagine.  The videos in the link clearly show that technically Microsoft has everything they need to shake, rattle, and roll Windows anyway you want.  I also think Larry is right that we will likely see DWM hacks for Vista that add wobbly windows and all sorts of other goodies.

ESR recently suggested that the Linux community needs to make compromises in order to more directly challlenge the Microsoft monopoly.  He’s right.  The gap is widening and wobbly windows is not nearly enough to close it.