http://www.reggieburnett.com/maybe-im-just-cranky/ Musings on life and technology Wed, 28 Sep 2011 05:44:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 http://www.reggieburnett.com/maybe-im-just-cranky/#comment-179 Busby SEO Test Spammer! Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:39:42 +0000 /post/Maybe-Im-just-cranky.aspx#comment-179 no you're not :D no you’re not

]]> http://www.reggieburnett.com/maybe-im-just-cranky/#comment-178 Jacob Alber Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:35:30 +0000 /post/Maybe-Im-just-cranky.aspx#comment-178 I am in whole-hearted agreement with you. With some of the newer Outlook features I refuse to give it up for subpar clients (even if they are free). And just working with Outlook makes me want to shoot the poor sod who decided that Windows Contacts and Outlook 2007 should be coded in such a way as to be a royal pain in the butt to keep in sync. Personally, if this carries on too long, I'll see if some sort of programmatic solution could keep this up, but one would think that a client I *paid* for, which was targetted to release around the same time as Vista, which I just patched so it would run under Vista (Technical Refresh) would be able to understand the Contacts folder... I am in whole-hearted agreement with you. With some of the newer Outlook features I refuse to give it up for subpar clients (even if they are free). And just working with Outlook makes me want to shoot the poor sod who decided that Windows Contacts and Outlook 2007 should be coded in such a way as to be a royal pain in the butt to keep in sync. Personally, if this carries on too long, I’ll see if some sort of programmatic solution could keep this up, but one would think that a client I *paid* for, which was targetted to release around the same time as Vista, which I just patched so it would run under Vista (Technical Refresh) would be able to understand the Contacts folder…

]]>