<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One of the things OS/X does right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reggieburnett.com/one-of-the-things-osx-does-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reggieburnett.com/one-of-the-things-osx-does-right/</link>
	<description>Musings on life and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 05:44:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: reggie</title>
		<link>http://www.reggieburnett.com/one-of-the-things-osx-does-right/#comment-2578</link>
		<dc:creator>reggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reggieburnett.com/?p=291#comment-2578</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right about that.  And I&#039;m sure that not all software is integrated into the OS/X system update but some are.  I still do all my work on Windows but it doesn&#039;t stop me from noticing when OS/X gets something right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right about that.  And I&#8217;m sure that not all software is integrated into the OS/X system update but some are.  I still do all my work on Windows but it doesn&#8217;t stop me from noticing when OS/X gets something right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.reggieburnett.com/one-of-the-things-osx-does-right/#comment-2577</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 01:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reggieburnett.com/?p=291#comment-2577</guid>
		<description>....and that should have been piece, not pisece. I hate it when other people are sloppy with the keyboard, so I had to correct myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.and that should have been piece, not pisece. I hate it when other people are sloppy with the keyboard, so I had to correct myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.reggieburnett.com/one-of-the-things-osx-does-right/#comment-2576</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 01:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reggieburnett.com/?p=291#comment-2576</guid>
		<description>Microsoft Automatic updates do provide notifications when there are driver updates for 3rd party hardware, etc.

Though, Microsoft and Apple are quite disparate, in that Apple ensure that the hardware works with their OS, including certifying drivers, etc.

Microsoft only produce the operating systems &amp; core software components, i.e. all software. This then gets deployed on a gamut of systems and configurations involving millions of combinations of components, etc.

To keep track of all the program and driver updates would involve some pretty heavy-duty logistics.

Apple cope because they have a tighter reign on what hardware and, to a certain extent, what software is allowed to be put in and on their systems. Tracking updates is essentially straight-forward because the vendors no doubt submit any updates to them first.

I am largely speculating and deducing from what I know about Apple. But even still, Microsoft do not have the same incentives to ensure a smoother running system then Apple do, though most people would instantly blame Windows for any incompatibilities of course. Where as with a Mac, Macccers would no doubt point the finger at the nearest program or pisece of hardware to the problem.

Just my £10.25 worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft Automatic updates do provide notifications when there are driver updates for 3rd party hardware, etc.</p>
<p>Though, Microsoft and Apple are quite disparate, in that Apple ensure that the hardware works with their OS, including certifying drivers, etc.</p>
<p>Microsoft only produce the operating systems &amp; core software components, i.e. all software. This then gets deployed on a gamut of systems and configurations involving millions of combinations of components, etc.</p>
<p>To keep track of all the program and driver updates would involve some pretty heavy-duty logistics.</p>
<p>Apple cope because they have a tighter reign on what hardware and, to a certain extent, what software is allowed to be put in and on their systems. Tracking updates is essentially straight-forward because the vendors no doubt submit any updates to them first.</p>
<p>I am largely speculating and deducing from what I know about Apple. But even still, Microsoft do not have the same incentives to ensure a smoother running system then Apple do, though most people would instantly blame Windows for any incompatibilities of course. Where as with a Mac, Macccers would no doubt point the finger at the nearest program or pisece of hardware to the problem.</p>
<p>Just my £10.25 worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

